Automotive Functional Safety and Safety Of The Intended Functionality (SOTIF) Research Report, 2024

Table of Contents

1 Status Quo and Trends of Automotive Functional Safety

• 1.1 Status Quo of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.1 Definition of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.2 Demand for Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.3 Main Features of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.4 Development History of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.5 Purposes of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.6 Basic Design Principle of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.7 General Automotive Functional Safety Workflow
  • 1.1.8 Example of SEooC Software Development Process
  • 1.1.9 Cost Structure of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.10 Classification of Automotive Functional Safety Software Tools
  • 1.1.11 Design and Verification Method of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.12 Basic Analysis Method of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.1.13 Basic Definition Related to Automotive Functional Safety
• 1.2 Development and Evolution of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.2.1 Difficulties in Mass Production of Automotive Functional Safety
  • 1.2.2 Evolution of Automotive Functional Safety (1)
  • 1.2.3 Evolution of Automotive Functional Safety (2)
  • 1.2.4 Fail Operational Case:
  • 1.2.5 Integrated Development Trends of Automotive Safety (1)
  • 1.2.6 Integrated Development Trends of Automotive Safety (2)
  • 1.2.7 Integrated Development Trends of Automotive Safety (3)
  • 1.2.8 Integrated Development Trends of Automotive Safety (4)
  • 1.2.9 Integrated Development Trends of Automotive Safety (5)

2 Status Quo and Trends of SOTIF

• 2.1 Overview of SOTIF
  • 2.1.1 Definition of SOTIF
  • 2.1.2 Why to Propose SOTIF
  • 2.1.3 Scenario Analysis of SOTIF
  • 2.1.4 Purposes of SOTIF
  • 2.1.5 SOTIF Methodology (1)
  • 2.1.6 Analysis Method of SOTIF System
  • 2.1.7 Typical Design Cases of L3 SOTIF
• 2.2 Development of SOTIF
  • 2.2.1 Automotive Functional Safety VS SOTIF
  • 2.2.2 Integration of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF (1)
  • 2.2.3 Integration of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF (2)
  • 2.2.4 Integration of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF Processes
  • 2.2.5 Integrated Development of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF
  • 2.2.6 Verification Management Integration of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF
  • 2.2.7 Machine Learning, Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF
  • 2.2.8 Technical Breakthrough in SOTIF
• 2.3 Research on SOTIF of Typical ADAS
  • 2.3.1 SOTIF of Lane Keeping System
  • 2.3.2 SOTIF of Automatic Brake Assist System
  • 2.3.3 SOTIF of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) System
  • 2.3.4 SOTIF of Traffic Jam Assist (TJA) System
  • 2.3.5 SOTIF of Automated Parking System
  • 2.3.6 SOTIF Design of Automotive AEB Control Strategy
• 2.4 SOTIF of Autonomous Driving System
  • 2.4.1 Composition of Autonomous Driving System
  • 2.4.2 Perception-related SOTIF
  • 2.4.3 Prediction-related SOTIF
  • 2.4.4 Decision-making-related SOTIF
  • 2.4.5 Control-related SOTIF Technology
  • 2.4.6 HMI-related SOTIF
  • 2.4.7 SOTIF of V2X

3 Standard and Policies for Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF

• 3.1 Major National Automotive Functional Safety Standards and Policies
  • 3.1.1 Global Automotive Functional Safety Standards
  • 3.1.2 Development of Foreign Functional Safety and SOTIF Standards
  • 3.1.3 Development of ISO 26262
  • 3.1.4 Automotive Functional Safety in the EU
  • 3.1.5 Development of Automotive Functional Safety in the USA
  • 3.1.6 Development of Automotive Functional Safety Standards in China
  • 3.1.7 Automotive Functional Safety Standards Research Organization in China
  • 3.1.8 Specific Automotive Functional Safety Standards in China
  • 3.1.9 Automotive Functional Safety Standards in China
  • 3.1.10 Test & Evaluation Method of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF
  • 3.1.11 Medium and Long-term Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF Standards Planning in China
  • 3.1.12 Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF Policies in China
  • 3.1.13 Guidelines for the Construction of the National Internet of Vehicles Industry Standard System (Intelligent Connected Vehicles) (2023)
  • 3.1.14 Notice on the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles: Overall Requirements and Organized Implementation
  • 3.1.15 Notice on the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles: Safety Measures
  • 3.1.16 Notice on the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles: Description
  • 3.1.17 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Functional Safety Requirements at Corporate Level
  • 3.1.18 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Corporate Requirements for Functional Safety Guarantee
  • 3.1.19 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Corporate Requirements for SOTIF Guarantee
  • 3.1.21 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Requirements at Product Level
  • 3.1.22 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Requirements for Functional Safety of Vehicles and Autonomous Driving Systems
  • 3.1.23 Guide on the Implementation of the Pilot Program for Admittance and Road Access of Intelligent Connected Vehicles (Trial): Requirements for SOTIF of Vehicles and Autonomous Driving Systems
• 3.2 Functional Safety Standards
  • 3.2.1 Automotive SOTIF Standards
  • 3.2.2 Requirements of Major National Autonomous Driving System Regulations and Standards on SOTIF
  • 3.2.3 Main SOTIF Standards in China
  • 3.2.4 Construction of SOTIF Standards in China
• 3.6 Introduction to ISO 26262
  • 3.3.1 ISO 26262
  • 3.3.2 ISO 26262:2011 VS ISO 26262:2018
  • 3.3.3 Content of ISO 26262
  • 3.3.4 ISO 26262-2: Functional Safety Management (1)
  • 3.3.5 ISO 26262-2: Functional Safety Management (2)
  • 3.3.6 ISO 26262-3: Concept of Functional Safety
  • 3.3.7 ISO 26262-3: Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) (1)
  • 3.3.8 ISO 26262-3: Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) (2)
  • 3.3.9 ISO 26262-3: Functional Safety Goals and Levels of Safety Requirements
  • 3.3.10 ISO 26262-4: System-level Product Development
  • 3.3.11 ISO 26262-4: Concept of Technical Safety
  • 3.3.12 ISO 26262-4: System Project Integration and Testing
  • 3.3.13 ISO 26262-5: Hardware-level Product Development
  • 3.3.14 ISO 26262-5: Hardware design
  • 3.3.15 ISO 26262-5: Hardware Safety Analysis
  • 3.3.16 ISO 26262-5: Hardware Design Verification
  • 3.3.17 ISO 26262-5: Evaluation of Hardware Architecture Metrics
  • 3.3.18 ISO 26262-5: Violation Evaluation of Safety Goals due to Random Hardware Failure
  • 3.3.19 ISO 26262-5: Hardware Integration and Verification
  • 3.3.20 ISO 26262-6: Software Functional Safety
  • 3.3.21 ISO 26262-6: Overview of Software-level Product Development
  • 3.3.22 ISO 26262-6: Software Development Plan
  • 3.3.23 ISO 26262-6: Software Safety Requirements
  • 3.3.24 ISO 26262-6: Software Architecture Design
  • 3.3.25 ISO 26262-6: Software Architecture Design - Software Safety Mechanism
  • 3.3.26 ISO 26262-6: Software Architecture Design - Software Error Handling Mechanism
  • 3.3.27 ISO 26262-6: Software Architecture Design - Software Architecture Verification Method
  • 3.3.28 ISO 26262-6: Software Unit Design and Implementation
  • 3.3.29 ISO 26262-6: Software Unit Verification
  • 3.3.30 ISO 26262-6: Software Unit Test Case Export and Coverage Analysis
  • 3.3.31 ISO 26262-6: Software Integration and Verification
  • 3.3.32 ISO 26262-6: Software Integration Test Coverage
  • 3.3.33 ISO 26262-6: Embedded Software Test
• 3.4 Introduction to ISO 21448
  • 3.4.1 SOTIF Standards
  • 3.4.2 Development of ISO 21448 for SOTIF
  • 3.4.3 Contents of ISO/CD 21448
  • 3.4.4 Development Process of SOTIF

4 Development of Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF Certification

• 4.1 Introduction to Automotive Functional Safety Certification
  • 4.1.1 Introduction to Automotive Functional Safety Certification
  • 4.1.2 Functional Safety Certification Types
  • 4.1.3 Main Process of Automotive Functional Safety Certification
  • 4.1.4 Basic Steps of Automotive Functional Safety Process Certification
  • 4.1.5 Basic Steps of Automotive Functional Safety Product Certification
  • 4.1.6 Cases of Automotive Functional Safety Product Certification Process
  • 4.1.7 Achievements of Automotive Functional Safety Certification
  • 4.1.8 Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL)
  • 4.1.9 Automotive Software Tool Confidence Level (TCL)
  • 4.1.10 TCL Evaluation Process
  • 4.1.11 Main Functional Safety Certification Methods
  • 4.1.12 Major Third-party Automotive Functional Safety Certification Agencies
  • 4.1.13 Statistics on Automotive Functional Safety Certification of Enterprises in China
• 4.2 SOTIF Certification
  • 4.2.1 Introduction to SOTIF Certification
  • 4.2.2 Process of SOTIF Certification
  • 4.2.3 SOTIF Guarantee Ssystem Assessment
  • 4.2.4 Main Deliverables of SOTIF Certification Management Process
  • 4.2.5 Third-party SOTIF Certification Agencies
  • 4.2.6 Enterprises with SOTIF Certification
• 4.3 Introduction to ASPICE
  • 4.3.1 Introduction to ASPICE
  • 4.3.2 Content of ASPICE
  • 4.3.3 ASPICE Levels
  • 4.3.4 Development Process of ASPICE
  • 4.3.5 ASPICE Process Construction and Tool Vendors
  • 4.3.6 Relationship between ASPICE and ISO 26262
  • 4.3.7 Integration of ASPICE and Functional Safety
  • 4.3.8 Integration of ASPICE and Vehicle Development
  • 4.3.9 Introduction to ASPICE Certification
  • 4.3.10 ASPICE Certification Process
  • 4.3.11 ASPICE Certification Review
  • 4.3.12 ASPICE Certification Review: Preparation for Review
  • 4.3.13 ASPICE Certification Review: Review
• 4.4 Major Automotive Functional Safety Certification Agencies
  • 4.4.1 SGS
    • 4.4.1.1 Functional Safety Services
    • 4.4.1.2 ISO 26262
    • 4.4.1.3 SOTIF Services
    • 4.4.1.4 Main ISO 26262 Customers: International
    • 4.4.1.5 Main ISO 26262 Customers: China
  • 4.4.2 TUV SUD
    • 4.4.2.1 Automotive Functional Safety Certification Services
    • 4.4.2.2 Functional Safety Training Services
  • 4.4.3 TUV Rheinland
    • 4.4.3.1 Automotive Services
    • 4.4.3.2 ISO 26262 Certification Services
    • 4.4.3.3 ASPICE certification
  • 4.4.4 DNV: Functional Safety Products
  • 4.4.5 UL Solutions
    • 4.4.5.1 UL Solutions: Functional Safety Certification Services
    • 4.4.5.2 UL Solutions: SOTIF Certification Services
  • 4.4.6 China Certification Centre for Automotive Products Co., Ltd. (CCAP)
    • 4.4.6.1 CCAP: Functional Safety Certification Services
    • 4.4.6.2 CCAP: ASPICE Technical Services
  • 4.4.7 China Quality Certification Center: Functional Safety Certification Services

5 Layout of OEMs in Automotive Functional Safety and SOTIF

• 5.1 Layout of OEMs in Automotive Functional Safety
  • 5.1.1 Global Recall Cases due to Automotive Functional Safety Failure
  • 5.1.2 Industrial Division of Labor in Automotive Functional Safety
  • 5.1.3 Work of OEMs and Parts Companies in Functional Safety
  • 5.1.4 Implementation Steps of Functional Safety of OEM Vehicle Projects
  • 5.1.5 OEMs' Evaluation on Suppliers' Functional Safety Capabilities
  • 5.1.6 Challenges and Key Elements in the Implementation of Functional Safety and SOTIF for Automakers
  • 5.1.7 SOTIF Development and Testing Process
  • 5.1.8 OEMs Pay More and More Attention to Functional Safety and SOTIF Requirements
  • 5.1.9 Functional Safety Certification of Major Local OEMs
  • 5.1.10 SOTIF Certification of OEMs
• 5.2 Layout of Major OEMs in Functional Safety
  • 5.2.1 BMW
    • 5.2.1.1 Safety Strategy
    • 5.2.1.2 Functional Safety of Autonomous Driving Platform Architecture (1)
    • 5.2.1.3 Functional Safety of Autonomous Driving Platform Architecture (2)
  • 5.2.2 Mercedes-Benz
    • 5.2.2.1 Automotive Functional Safety
    • 5.2.2.2 Functional Safety and SOTIF of L3 Drive Pilot
    • 5.2.2.3 Integrated Safety Concept
  • 5.2.3 Ford's Safety Strategy
  • 5.2.4 Volvo's World Tree Intelligent Safety System
  • 5.2.5 Changan Automobile
    • 5.2.5.1 Status quo of Functional Safety Layout
    • 5.2.5.2 Functional Safety Team
    • 5.2.5.3 Business Concept of Functional Safety
    • 5.2.5.4 Software Quality Management: System Construction
    • 5.2.5.5 Software Quality Management: Organizational Settings
    • 5.2.5.6 Functional Safety/SOTIF of Software Quality Management
  • 5.2.6 GAC
    • 5.2.6.1 Functional Safety of the Latest EEA
    • 5.2.6.2 Functional Safety of Intelligent Driving System
    • 5.2.6.3 Functional Safety Certification
  • 5.2.7 Great Wall Motor
    • 5.2.7.1 Functional Safety of GEEP 4.0
    • 5.2.7.2 Functional Safety Certification
  • 5.2.8 Geely
    • 5.2.8.1 Global Safety Layout
    • 5.2.8.3 Functional Safety Certification
    • 5.2.8.3 Functional Safety Design of GEEA 3.0
    • 5.2.8.4 Steer-by-Wire (SbW) Functional Safety Design Solution
  • 5.2.9 Automotive Functional Safety of ENOVATE: Functional Safety Project Implementation (Torque)
  • 5.2.10 Functional Safety Design of NIO SkyOS

6 Functional Safety Requirements and Solutions for Main Auto Parts

• 6.1 Functional Safety Requirements and Solutions for Main Auto Parts
  • 6.1.1 Fields Involved in Automotive Functional Safety
  • 6.1.2 ASIL Requirements for Main Auto Parts
  • 6.1.3 ASIL Requirements for Common ECUs
  • 6.1.4 Functional Safety Requirements for ADAS
  • 6.1.5 Functional Safety Requirements for HPA
  • 6.1.6 Functional Safety Requirements for ICC System
  • 6.1.7 Functional Safety Requirements for the Underlying Software Layer of Automotive Domain Controllers
• 6.2 Layout of Main Parts Suppliers and Related Products in Automotive Functional Safety
  • 6.2.1 Layout of Parts Suppliers in Automotive Functional Safety
  • 6.2.2 Functional Safety Certification of Major Operating System Enterprises
  • 6.2.3 Functional Safety Certification of Major Enterprises in Basic Software System
  • 6.2.4 Functional Safety Certification of Major Enterprises in Electric Drive and Power System
  • 6.2.5 Functional Safety Certification of Major Enterprises in BMS, Batteries and Other Fields
  • 6.2.6 Functional Safety Certification in Simulation and Testing Tools
  • 6.2.7 Functional Safety Certification in Main Intelligent Driving Products
  • 6.2.8 Functional Safety Certification in Chips, Domain Controllers and Computing Platforms (1)
  • 6.2.9 Functional Safety Certification in Chips, Domain Controllers and Computing Platforms (2)
  • 6.2.10 Functional Safety Certification in LiDAR, Gateways, Vehicle Lights, etc.
  • 6.2.11 Layout Cases of Suppliers in Functional Safety
  • 6.2.12 Functional Safety and SOTIF of Baidu Apollo
• 6.3 Functional Safety Cases of Main Auto Parts
  • 6.3.1 Functional Safety Solutions for Chips and Computing Platforms
    • 6.3.1.1 Typical Allocation of Functional Safety in Automotive SoC
    • 6.3.1.2 Automotive SoC Functional Safety Solutions
    • 6.3.1.3 Automotive SoC/MCU Functional Safety Solutions
    • 6.3.1.4 Digital Chip Functional Safety
    • 6.3.1.5 Functional Safety of Automotive Intelligent computing Platforms
    • 6.3.1.6 Functional Safety Assessment of Basic Automotive Computing Platforms
    • 6.3.1.7 Functional Safety of DRAM
    • 6.3.1.8 Functional Safety Design for High-level Autonomous Driving Domain Controllers
  • 6.3.2 Functional Safety of Operating Systems
    • 6.3.2.1 High Safety Requirements of the Next-generation Intelligent Vehicle Operating System
    • 6.3.2.2 Landing of Functional Safety of Intelligent Vehicle Operating Systems
    • 6.3.2.3 Functional Safety of Linux (1)
    • 6.3.2.4 Functional Safety of Linux (2)
    • 6.3.2.5 Functional Safety of Blackberry QNX OS
    • 6.3.2.6 Functional Safety of Automotive Operating Systems
  • 6.3.3 Functional Safety of Automotive Software Systems
    • 6.3.3.1 Technical Difficulties in Functional Safety of Intelligent Vehicle Software
    • 6.3.3.2 Solutions to Technical Difficulties in Functional Safety of Intelligent Vehicle Software
    • 6.3.3.3 V-type Development of Functional Safety of Intelligent Vehicle Software
    • 6.3.3.4 Functional Safety Testing of Intelligent Vehicle Software
    • 6.3.3.5 Development Trends of Functional Safety of Intelligent Vehicle Software
    • 6.3.3.6 Functional Safety Solutions of Blackberry QNX Basic Platform Software
    • 6.3.3.7 Functional Safety of QNX Hypervisor Basic Software Platform
    • 6.3.3.8 Functional Safety of Blackberry QNX-based Cockpit-driving Integrated Controllers
    • 6.3.3.9 Functional Safety of AUTOSAR
    • 6.3.3.10 Autonomous Driving Software Middleware Functional Safety Solutions
  • 6.3.4 Functional Safety of Automotive Intelligent Driving Systems
    • 6.3.4.1 Safety Architecture of ADAS Controllers
    • 6.3.4.2 Safety Architecture of ADAS LDW
    • 6.3.4.3 End-to-end Functional Safety Examples of L2 Autonomous Driving Systems
    • 6.3.4.4 Functional Safety of Autonomous Driving Computing and Decision-making System Platforms
    • 6.3.4.5 Functional Safety of Parking Systems
    • 6.3.4.6 Safety Design Cases of Autonomous Driving Systems
  • 6.3.5 Functional Safety Development of Central Integrated Electronic and Electrical Architectures
    • 6.3.5.1 Functional Safety Development and Design Challenges for Central Integrated EEAs
    • 6.3.5.2 Functional Safety Development Process
    • 6.3.5.3 Functional Safety Development Requirements of Central Integrated EEAs
    • 6.3.5.4 Functional Safety Development Redundancy Design of Central Integrated EEAs
    • 6.3.5.5 Functional Safety Development Cases of Central Integrated EEAs: IM Motors
  • 6.3.6 Functional Safety of Other Automotive Systems
    • 6.3.6.1 Functional Safety Design Features of LiDAR
    • 6.3.6.2 Functional Safety Requirements for Automotive Display
    • 6.3.6.3 PACK Functional Safety Concept
    • 6.3.6.4 Automotive Network Functional Safety
    • 6.3.6.5 Functional Safety Solutions of Steer-by-Wire Systems
    • 6.3.6.6 SOTIF Solutions of Steer-by-Wire Systems

7 Automotive Functional Safety Solutions of Main Enterprises

• 7.1 Synopsys
  • 7.1.1 Native Automotive Solutions
  • 7.1.2 TestMAX Testing Solutions
  • 7.1.3 Functional Safety Verification Solutions
  • 7.1.4 VC Functional Safety Management
  • 7.1.5 IP for ISO 26262
  • 7.1.6 Functional-safety-standard-compliant IP for ADAS SoC
  • 7.1.7 Functional-safety-standard-compliant IP for Connected Car and Infotainment System SoC
  • 7.1.8 Functional-safety-standard-compliant IP for Gateways
  • 7.1.9 DesignWare IP Subsystem
  • 7.1.10 DesignWare ARC Functional Safety Software
  • 7.1.11 IP for ISO 26262
  • 7.1.12 Dynamics
• 7.2 Jingwei Hirain
  • 7.2.1 Profile
  • 7.2.2 Functional Safety Solutions for Intelligent Connected Vehicles (1)
  • 7.2.3 Functional Safety Solutions for Intelligent Connected Vehicles (2)
  • 7.2.4 Functional Safety Solutions for Intelligent Connected Vehicles (3)
  • 7.2.5 Intelligent Driving Functional Safety Development Platform
  • 7.2.6 Functional Safety Testing Solutions for Intelligent Connected Vehicles
  • 7.2.7 Intelligent Driving Functional Safety & SOTIF Development and Verification Platform
  • 7.2.8 SOTIF Solutions
• 7.3 Vector
  • 7.3.1 Vector: Functional Safety Solutions
  • 7.3.2 PREEvision Design Tools Support Functional Safety Process
  • 7.3.3 MICROSAR Safe
• 7.4 Bosch
  • 7.4.1 Functional Safety Services
  • 7.4.2 TARA
  • 7.4.3 System Redundancy Design Solution
  • 7.4.4 Functional Safety Design of Hybrid Vehicles
  • 7.4.5 Mainstream Smart Cockpit Functional Safety Solutions
• 7.5 Continental
  • 7.5.1 Functional Safety Services
  • 7.5.2 Functional Safety Training Services
• 7.6 NXP
  • 7.6.1 Organizational Structure ofo Automotive Functional Safety
  • 7.6.2 Functional Safety Solutions: SafeAssure (1)
  • 7.6.3 Functional Safety Solutions: SafeAssure (2)
  • 7.6.4 Functional Safety Solutions
  • 7.6.5 Confirmation Measures in ISO 26262
  • 7.6.6 The Development Process Conforms to ISO 26262
  • 7.6.7 Functional Safety Levels of Basic System Chips
  • 7.6.8 Functional Safety Architecture of the Next-generation Platform
  • 7.6.9 Functional Safety Architecture of the Next-generation Platform: Hardware Safety
  • 7.6.10 Functional Safety Architecture of the Next-generation Platform: Safety Software Development Kit (SDK) (1)
  • 7.6.11 Functional Safety Architecture of the Next-generation Platform: Safety Software Development Kit (SDK) (2)
  • 7.6.12 Functional Safety Architecture of the Next-generation Platform: Safety Software Combination
  • 7.6.13 ASIL-D-compliant ECU Architecture Design
  • 7.6.14 ASIL-D-compliant L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Architecture
  • 7.6.15 Autonomous Driving Functional Safety Solutions
• 7.7 Renesas
  • 7.7.1 Automotive Electronic Functional Safety Technical Support Projects
  • 7.7.2 Quantitative Analysis Tools Simplify ISO 26262 Certification
  • 7.7.3 Automotive Electronic Functional Safety Technical Support Projects
  • 7.7.4 ASIL-D System Security Mechanism of V3U with Self-diagnosis Capability
• 7.8 Texas Instruments
  • 7.8.1 Product Types for Functional Safety Design
  • 7.8.2 Functional Safety Services
  • 7.8.3 Standard Quality Management Development Process
• 7.9 Infineon
  • 7.9.1 Classification of Automotive-grade Products (1)
  • 7.9.2 Classification of Automotive-grade Products (2)
  • 7.9.3 Functional Safety Solutions
  • 7.9.4 Overall Functional Safety Solutions
  • 7.9.5 Functional Safety Solutions
  • 7.9.6 Building Blocks with Integrated Functional Safety
  • 7.9.7 Power Distribution System Functional Safety Solutions
• 7.10 eSOL
  • 7.10.1 Main Tools for Functional Safety
  • 7.10.2 Activities and Tools for Functional Safety Standards
  • 7.10.3 Consulting Services for Functional Safety Standards
  • 7.10.4 Documentation Package Products Related to Automotive Functional Safety
• 7.11 CICV
  • 7.11.1 Profile
  • 7.11.2 Functional Safety Software Tools
  • 7.11.3 Quality Management Features and Tools of Functional Safety
  • 7.11.4 Review of Functional Safety Software Tools
  • 7.11.5 SOTIF Working Group
  • 7.11.6 SOTIF Development Process
• 7.12 SaimoAI
  • 7.12.1 Profile
  • 7.12.2 SOTIF Analysis Tool: Safety Pro (1)
  • 7.12.3 SOTIF Analysis Tool: Safety Pro (2)
  • 7.12.4 External Cooperation