Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - Advanced Point-Source Carbon Capture Solutions Providers: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for Eight Advanced Point-Source Carbon Capture Solutions Providers

Description

List of Tables

As decarbonization efforts gain momentum, point-source carbon dioxide capture technology is attracting more attention, especially for hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as industry and power generation. As a result, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a growing industry, both in project development and in policy support mechanisms, including tax credits, carbon pricing, and markets; direct subsidies; and regulated business models that span the CCUS value chain.

Progress in market deployments has been slow, however, as has progress toward reaching net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050. In more mature markets such as Europe and North America, current barriers have rendered progress in reaching final investment decisions slower than expected. Still, growth of the CCUS industry is accelerating, and the competitive space is subject to change as vendor projects and technologies mature, merger and acquisition activity grows, and policies and legislation change.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard accesses advanced carbon capture solutions providers in commercial-scale point-source capture applications, where CO2 is captured at the point of emissions as a part of a contemporary commercial CCUS project. It identifies and ranks eight successful carbon capture solution providers with projects in commercial operation or advanced commercial development that cumulatively capture at least 1.5 million metric tons of CO2 per year.

Top Vendors

Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Honeywell UOP

Linde

Air Liquide

Aker Carbon Capture

Air Products

Fluor

Product Code: LB-PSCC-24

1. Executive Summary

1.1 Market Introduction
1.2 Vendor Criteria
1.3 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

2.1 Market Definition
2.2 Market Drivers
- 2.2.1 Pricing Carbon
- 2.2.2 Government Incentives
2.3 Market Barriers
- 2.3.1 Business Models
- 2.3.2 High Costs
- 2.3.3 Regulatory Frameworks
2.4 Market Trends
- 2.4.1 Slowing Project Announcements
- 2.4.2 Demand and Market Consolidation
- 2.4.3 Innovation
- 2.4.4 Evolving Business Models

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
- 3.1.1 Leaders
- 3.1.2 Contenders
- 3.1.3 Challengers
- 3.1.4 Followers
3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

4.1 Introduction
4.2 Leaders
- 4.2.1 Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies
- 4.2.2 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
- 4.2.3 Honeywell Universal Oil Products
4.3 Contenders
- 4.3.1 Linde
- 4.3.2 Air Liquide
- 4.3.3 Aker Carbon Capture
- 4.3.4 Air Products
4.4 Challengers
- 4.4.1 Fluor Corporation
4.5 Followers
4.6 Upcoming Players
- 4.6.1 NET Power
- 4.6.2 ION Clean Energy
- 4.6.3 Capsol Technologies
- 4.6.4 Carbon Capture America

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

8.1 Scope of Study
8.2 Sources and Methodology
- 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
- 8.2.2 Project Status Definitions
- 8.2.3 Ratings Scale
  - 8.2.3.1 Score Calculations
- 8.2.4 Criteria Definitions
  - 8.2.4.1 Strategy
  - 8.2.4.2 Execution

Product Code: LB-PSCC-24

List of Tables

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores

Vendor Scores

Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria

Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

Shell Catalysts & Technologies / Technip Energies Strategy and Execution Score

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Strategy and Execution Scores

Honeywell Universal Oil Products Strategy and Execution Scores

Linde Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Air Liquide Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Aker Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Air Products Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Fluor Strategy and Execution Scores