Wound Closure Devices Market by Product, Wound Type, Application, End-User

List of Tables

The Wound Closure Devices Market was valued at USD 17.97 billion in 2023, expected to reach USD 19.27 billion in 2024, and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.44%, to USD 29.71 billion by 2030.

The global wound closure devices market is characterized by tools and techniques used to close and heal surgical incisions, lacerations, or other wound types. These include sutures, staples, hemostatic agents, adhesives, and sealants. The need for effective wound closure devices is underpinned by increasing surgical procedures, a rise in traumatic injuries, and advancements in technology offering rapid and effective healing. Applications span across hospitals, clinics, and ambulatory surgical centers, targeting a diverse patient group from general surgeries to cosmetic procedures. Notably, the market is bolstered by a growing elderly population, who typically experience slower wound recovery, thus driving demand for innovative closure solutions. Key factors influencing growth include the steady rise in surgical procedures, technological advancements like absorbable sutures, and augmented healthcare expenditure. Additionally, collaborations and mergers among market players are fostering product development. Emerging markets, with evolving healthcare infrastructure and increasing awareness, offer significant opportunities. Firms could capitalize on these by investing in localized strategies and product differentiation through R&D in biodegradable closure materials. However, limitations include the high cost of advanced devices, stringent regulatory requirements, and the complex competitive landscape. Challenges also extend to the risk of infections associated with certain devices and a lack of skilled professionals in low-resource settings. Opportunities for innovation lie in bioactive wound closure materials and smart wound care technologies that provide real-time monitoring. Research into nanotechnology and tissue engineering for wound healing can also spur growth. The market is dynamic with constant innovation, making it essential for companies to stay abreast of technological advancements and evolving consumer needs. By focusing on cost-effective innovations and leveraging digital platforms for awareness, businesses can tap into unmet needs and expand their footprint globally.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2023]	USD 17.97 billion
Estimated Year [2024]	USD 19.27 billion
Forecast Year [2030]	USD 29.71 billion
CAGR (%)	7.44%

Market Dynamics: Unveiling Key Market Insights in the Rapidly Evolving Wound Closure Devices Market

The Wound Closure Devices Market is undergoing transformative changes driven by a dynamic interplay of supply and demand factors. Understanding these evolving market dynamics prepares business organizations to make informed investment decisions, refine strategic decisions, and seize new opportunities. By gaining a comprehensive view of these trends, business organizations can mitigate various risks across political, geographic, technical, social, and economic domains while also gaining a clearer understanding of consumer behavior and its impact on manufacturing costs and purchasing trends.

Market Drivers
- Increasing incidence of chronic and acute wounds among people
- Government initiatives regarding wound care treatment
- Expansion of burn-care centers in economies with improving healthcare infrastructure
Market Restraints
- High cost of wound closure device
Market Opportunities
- Ongoing development of advanced wound care technologies
- Rising approvals for the commercialization of wound closure devices
Market Challenges
- Complications and probable side effect with the use of wound closure device

Porter's Five Forces: A Strategic Tool for Navigating the Wound Closure Devices Market

Porter's five forces framework is a critical tool for understanding the competitive landscape of the Wound Closure Devices Market. It offers business organizations with a clear methodology for evaluating their competitive positioning and exploring strategic opportunities. This framework helps businesses assess the power dynamics within the market and determine the profitability of new ventures. With these insights, business organizations can leverage their strengths, address weaknesses, and avoid potential challenges, ensuring a more resilient market positioning.

PESTLE Analysis: Navigating External Influences in the Wound Closure Devices Market

External macro-environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping the performance dynamics of the Wound Closure Devices Market. Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors analysis provides the necessary information to navigate these influences. By examining PESTLE factors, businesses can better understand potential risks and opportunities. This analysis enables business organizations to anticipate changes in regulations, consumer preferences, and economic trends, ensuring they are prepared to make proactive, forward-thinking decisions.

Market Share Analysis: Understanding the Competitive Landscape in the Wound Closure Devices Market

A detailed market share analysis in the Wound Closure Devices Market provides a comprehensive assessment of vendors' performance. Companies can identify their competitive positioning by comparing key metrics, including revenue, customer base, and growth rates. This analysis highlights market concentration, fragmentation, and trends in consolidation, offering vendors the insights required to make strategic decisions that enhance their position in an increasingly competitive landscape.

FPNV Positioning Matrix: Evaluating Vendors' Performance in the Wound Closure Devices Market

The Forefront, Pathfinder, Niche, Vital (FPNV) Positioning Matrix is a critical tool for evaluating vendors within the Wound Closure Devices Market. This matrix enables business organizations to make well-informed decisions that align with their goals by assessing vendors based on their business strategy and product satisfaction. The four quadrants provide a clear and precise segmentation of vendors, helping users identify the right partners and solutions that best fit their strategic objectives.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Wound Closure Devices Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Medela AG, Arthrex, Inc., DUKAL Corporation, RedDress Medical Ltd., Teleflex Incorporated, Baxter International Inc., Bactiguard AB, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Spectral AI, Inc., 3M Company, Boston Scientific Corporation, Abbott Laboratories, Molnlycke Health Care AB, Clozex Medical, Inc., Harro Hofliger Verpackungsmaschinen GmbH, DermaClip US, LLC, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Dolphin Sutures by Futura Surgicare Pvt Ltd, DermaRite Industries, LLC, B. Braun SE, Riverpoint Medical, Advanced Medical Solutions Group PLC, Coloplast A/S, SYLKE, Evonik Industries AG, Inotec AMD Limited, Healiva SA, Sky Medical Technology Ltd., Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, Convatec Group PLC, MediWound, DeRoyal Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., Artivion, Inc., Smith & Nephew PLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Medtronic PLC, Stryker Corporation, Medline Industries, LP, and Gentell.

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Wound Closure Devices Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Based on Product, market is studied across Adhesives, Mechanical Wound Closure Devices, Sealants, Staples, Strips, and Sutures. The Adhesives is further studied across Acrylics, Biological Adhesives, Polyurethanes, and Silicone. The Sealants is further studied across Collagen Based, Non-Synthetic, and Synthetic. The Strips is further studied across Non-Sterile and Sterile. The Sutures is further studied across Absorbable and Non-Absorbable.
Based on Wound Type, market is studied across Acute Wounds and Chronic Wounds.
Based on Application, market is studied across Burns, Cardiology, Diabetic Foot Ulcers, General Surgery, Gynaecology, Ophthalmic, and Orthopedics.
Based on End-User, market is studied across Burn Care Centers, Clinics, Home Care Setting, and Hospital.
Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across Alaska, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the market, covering key focus areas:

1. Market Penetration: A detailed review of the current market environment, including extensive data from top industry players, evaluating their market reach and overall influence.

2. Market Development: Identifies growth opportunities in emerging markets and assesses expansion potential in established sectors, providing a strategic roadmap for future growth.

3. Market Diversification: Analyzes recent product launches, untapped geographic regions, major industry advancements, and strategic investments reshaping the market.

4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides a thorough analysis of the competitive landscape, examining market share, business strategies, product portfolios, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent trends, and technological advancements of key players.

5. Product Development & Innovation: Highlights cutting-edge technologies, R&D activities, and product innovations expected to drive future market growth.

The report also answers critical questions to aid stakeholders in making informed decisions:

1. What is the current market size, and what is the forecasted growth?

2. Which products, segments, and regions offer the best investment opportunities?

3. What are the key technology trends and regulatory influences shaping the market?

4. How do leading vendors rank in terms of market share and competitive positioning?

5. What revenue sources and strategic opportunities drive vendors' market entry or exit strategies?

Product Code: MRR-221461476F5D

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

5.1. Market Dynamics
- 5.1.1. Drivers
  - 5.1.1.1. Increasing incidence of chronic and acute wounds among people
  - 5.1.1.2. Government initiatives regarding wound care treatment
  - 5.1.1.3. Expansion of burn-care centers in economies with improving healthcare infrastructure
- 5.1.2. Restraints
  - 5.1.2.1. High cost of wound closure device
- 5.1.3. Opportunities
  - 5.1.3.1. Ongoing development of advanced wound care technologies
  - 5.1.3.2. Rising approvals for the commercialization of wound closure devices
- 5.1.4. Challenges
  - 5.1.4.1. Complications and probable side effect with the use of wound closure device
5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
- 5.2.1. Product: Rising preference for sutures in wound closure devices
- 5.2.2. Application: Increasing usage of wound closure devices in general surgery for faster healing times
- 5.2.3. Wound Type: Growing application of wound closure devices for acute wounds to promote healing
- 5.2.4. End-User: Expanding adoption of wound closure devices in hospitals for surgical procedures
5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
- 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
- 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
- 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
5.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 5.4.1. Political
- 5.4.2. Economic
- 5.4.3. Social
- 5.4.4. Technological
- 5.4.5. Legal
- 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Product

6.1. Introduction
6.2. Adhesives
- 6.2.1. Acrylics
- 6.2.2. Biological Adhesives
- 6.2.3. Polyurethanes
- 6.2.4. Silicone
6.3. Mechanical Wound Closure Devices
6.4. Sealants
- 6.4.1. Collagen Based
- 6.4.2. Non-Synthetic
- 6.4.3. Synthetic
6.5. Staples
6.6. Strips
- 6.6.1. Non-Sterile
- 6.6.2. Sterile
6.7. Sutures
- 6.7.1. Absorbable
- 6.7.2. Non-Absorbable

7. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Wound Type

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Acute Wounds
7.3. Chronic Wounds

8. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Application

8.1. Introduction
8.2. Burns
8.3. Cardiology
8.4. Diabetic Foot Ulcers
8.5. General Surgery
8.6. Gynaecology
8.7. Ophthalmic
8.8. Orthopedics

9. Wound Closure Devices Market, by End-User

9.1. Introduction
9.2. Burn Care Centers
9.3. Clinics
9.4. Home Care Setting
9.5. Hospital

10. Americas Wound Closure Devices Market

10.1. Introduction
10.2. Argentina
10.3. Brazil
10.4. Canada
10.5. Mexico
10.6. United States

11. Asia-Pacific Wound Closure Devices Market

11.1. Introduction
11.2. Australia
11.3. China
11.4. India
11.5. Indonesia
11.6. Japan
11.7. Malaysia
11.8. Philippines
11.9. Singapore
11.10. South Korea
11.11. Taiwan
11.12. Thailand
11.13. Vietnam

12. Europe, Middle East & Africa Wound Closure Devices Market

12.1. Introduction
12.2. Denmark
12.3. Egypt
12.4. Finland
12.5. France
12.6. Germany
12.7. Israel
12.8. Italy
12.9. Netherlands
12.10. Nigeria
12.11. Norway
12.12. Poland
12.13. Qatar
12.14. Russia
12.15. Saudi Arabia
12.16. South Africa
12.17. Spain
12.18. Sweden
12.19. Switzerland
12.20. Turkey
12.21. United Arab Emirates
12.22. United Kingdom

13. Competitive Landscape

13.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
13.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
13.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
- 13.3.1. MediWound Announces Collaboration with 3M on EscharEx Phase III Study
- 13.3.2. SYNDEO Medical Announces Multi-Year Strategic Distribution Agreement with Clozex Medical, Inc.
- 13.3.3. Coloplast A/S to Acquire Wound Care Company Kerecis for USD 1.3 Billion
- 13.3.4. Evonik Company JeNaCell Launches Wound Dressing Epicite Balance for Chronic Wounds
- 13.3.5. Tube Investments, Premji Invest Partner Up To Acquire Lotus Surgicals For INR 348 Crore
- 13.3.6. Bactiguard Launches Wound Care Line in the UK and Ireland
- 13.3.7. KitoTech Medical Inc. Signs Agreement with Synergy Corporation for International Distribution of Their Medical and Consumer Products
- 13.3.8. Gentell, Inc. Completed the Acquisition of Non-Core Traditional Wound Care Business of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
- 13.3.9. Introducing Antibacterial Suture Range
- 13.3.10. AMS Receives FDA Clearance for New Wound Closure Device
- 13.3.11. KitoTech Medical Signs Agreement with Corza Medical to Market microMend PRO Wound Closure Devices in the U.S.
- 13.3.12. Entry Into the Attractive Wound Biologics Segment Through the Acquisition of Triad Life Sciences Inc.

Companies Mentioned

1. Medela AG
2. Arthrex, Inc.
3. DUKAL Corporation
4. RedDress Medical Ltd.
5. Teleflex Incorporated
6. Baxter International Inc.
7. Bactiguard AB
8. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
9. Spectral AI, Inc.
10. 3M Company
11. Boston Scientific Corporation
12. Abbott Laboratories
13. Molnlycke Health Care AB
14. Clozex Medical, Inc.
15. Harro Hofliger Verpackungsmaschinen GmbH
16. DermaClip US, LLC
17. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
18. McKesson Corporation
19. Dolphin Sutures by Futura Surgicare Pvt Ltd
20. DermaRite Industries, LLC
21. B. Braun SE
22. Riverpoint Medical
23. Advanced Medical Solutions Group PLC
24. Coloplast A/S
25. SYLKE
26. Evonik Industries AG
27. Inotec AMD Limited
28. Healiva SA
29. Sky Medical Technology Ltd.
30. Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
31. Convatec Group PLC
32. MediWound
33. DeRoyal Industries, Inc.
34. Cardinal Health, Inc.
35. Artivion, Inc.
36. Smith & Nephew PLC
37. Becton, Dickinson and Company
38. Medtronic PLC
39. Stryker Corporation
40. Medline Industries, LP
41. Gentell