Picture

Questions?

+1-866-353-3335

SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1555815

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1555815

Wound and Tissue Management Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis | United States | 2024-2030 | MedSuite | Includes: Wound Closure Market, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, and 11 more

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 505 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PDF (Single User License)
USD 7995
PDF (Site License)
USD 8995
PDF (Corporate License)
USD 9995

Add to Cart

In 2023, the U.S. wound and tissue management market was valued at $12.2 billion, with expectations for it to grow at a 3.9% CAGR, reaching $15.9 billion by the end of the forecast period. The full report on this market encompasses a wide range of segments, including wound closure, traditional and advanced wound dressings (such as moist, antimicrobial, interactive, and non-adherent contact layers), surgical hemostats, tissue sealants, anti-adhesion products, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), static compression therapy, and dynamic compression therapy.

DATA COVERED IN THE REPORT:

  • Unit Sales, Pricing Trends, and Market Growth
  • Projections to 2030 and Historical Insights from 2020
  • Key Drivers and Restraints by Segment
  • Competitive Landscape with Market Share Breakdown
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Procedure Volumes
  • Competitor Profiles, Product Portfolios, and SWOT Analysis for Leading Companies
  • Impact of COVID-19

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET TRENDS:

While most wound and tissue management segments are experiencing growth, the market faces challenges due to the availability of alternative wound care options. Traditional wound dressings are increasingly being replaced by advanced products, although even within the advanced segment, some dressings are outperformed by newer methods tailored to specific wound types

.U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET LEADERS:

Three major companies dominate the U.S. wound and tissue management market: Ethicon, 3M, and Medtronic.

  • Ethicon holds the top position, primarily due to its leading role in wound closure, representing over 25% of the total market. Additionally, Ethicon has a strong presence in surgical hemostats, anti-adhesion, and tissue sealants, with steady growth expected in these sectors.
  • 3M ranks second, driven by its dominant 75%+ market share in NPWT and significant stake in advanced wound dressings. Both segments are anticipated to grow at a 4-5% CAGR, reinforcing 3M's strong foothold.
  • Medtronic secures third place, thanks to its significant share in wound closure products like sutures, staplers, and ligating clips, which account for over a quarter of that market segment. Despite limited activity in other areas, Medtronic's position in wound closure ensures its market strength.

MARKET SEGMENTATION OVERVIEW:

  • Wound Closure Market: Includes sutures, staplers, ligating clips, skin closure strips, mesh, and cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives.
  • Traditional Wound Dressings: Comprises gauze, tapes, bandages (excluding compression types), and cotton-based products.
  • Advanced Wound Dressings: Covers moist, antimicrobial, interactive dressings, and non-adherent contact layers.
  • Moist Dressings: Encompasses foam, transparent films, hydrocolloid, alginate, gelling fiber, and hydrogel dressings.
  • Antimicrobial Dressings: Includes both silver-based and non-silver antimicrobial options.
  • Interactive Dressings: Biomaterials such as collagen-based products and skin substitutes.
  • Non-Adherent Contact Layers: Used in hospital and alternate care settings.
  • Surgical Hemostats: Includes thrombin-based, oxidized cellulose, gelatin, collagen, polysaccharide, and combination hemostats.
  • Tissue Sealants: Includes fibrin, protein, and synthetic-based tissue sealants.
  • Anti-Adhesion: Used for gynecological, abdominal, and other surgeries to prevent adhesion.
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT): Includes single-use pumps, conventional NPWT rentals, dressings, and canisters.
  • Static Compression Therapy: Consists of compression stockings, AES, compression bandages, and Unna boots.
  • Dynamic Compression Therapy: Comprises dynamic DVT prevention sleeves, mobile DVT prevention, and pneumatic compression devices.

RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY:

  • Regions: United States
  • Base Year: 2023
  • Forecast Period: 2024-2030
  • Historical Data: 2020-2022
  • Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Shares, Forecasts, Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Prices
  • Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Trends, Limiters, Competitive
  • Landscape, SWOT, Mergers & Acquisitions, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies,
  • Disease Insights
  • Data Sources: Interviews with industry experts, government and regulatory data, hospital statistics, import/export records, and internal iData Research databases.
Product Code: iDATA_USWT24_MS

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE of CONTENTS

List of Figures

List of Charts

executive summary

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Market Trends

Market Developments

Markets Included

Key Report Updates

Version History

research methodology

  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
  • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
  • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
  • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Wound and tissue management Market

  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
    • 2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
    • 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
    • 2.2.3 Best Case Scenario

Disease Overview

  • 3.1 Disease Treatment and Diagnostic
    • 3.1.1 Vascular Malformations
    • 3.1.2 Deep Ven Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
    • 3.1.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
    • 3.1.4 Lymphedema
    • 3.1.5 Surgery
    • 3.1.6 Traumas and Burns
  • 3.2 Patient Demographics
    • 3.2.1 Vascular Malformations
    • 3.2.2 Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
    • 3.2.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
    • 3.2.4 Lymphedema
    • 3.2.5 Traumas and Burns

Product Assessment

  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Product Portfolios
    • 4.2.1 Wound Closure Devices
      • 4.2.1.1 Sutures
      • 4.2.1.2 Staplers
      • 4.2.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
      • 4.2.1.4 Wound Closure Strips
      • 4.2.1.5 Tissue Adhesives
    • 4.2.2 Traditional Wound Dressings
    • 4.2.3 Advanced Wound Dressings
    • 4.2.4 Moist Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.1 Foam Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.4 Alginate Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
    • 4.2.5 Antimicrobial Dressings
      • 4.2.5.1.1 Silver Dressing
      • 4.2.5.1.2 Non-Silver Dressing
      • 4.2.5.1.3 Charcoal Dressing
    • 4.2.6 Interactive Dressing
      • 4.2.6.1.1 Bioactive Dressings
      • 4.2.6.1.2 Skin Substitute
    • 4.2.7 Non-Adherent Contact Layer
    • 4.2.8 Surgical Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.1 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.3 Gelatin-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.4 Collagen-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.5 Combination Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.6 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.7 First-Responder Hemostat
    • 4.2.9 Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.1 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.2 Protein-Based Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
    • 4.2.10 Anti-Adhesion
    • 4.2.11 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    • 4.2.12 Static Compression Therapy
      • 4.2.12.1 Compression Stockings
      • 4.2.12.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
      • 4.2.12.3 Compression Bandages
      • 4.2.12.4 Unna Boots
    • 4.2.13 Dynamic Compression Therapy
      • 4.2.13.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention
      • 4.2.13.2 Mobile DVT Prevention
      • 4.2.13.3 Pneumatic Compression
  • 4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
    • 4.3.1 Wound Closure Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.2 Moist Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.4 Interactive Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.5 Surgical Hemostat Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.6 Tissue Sealant Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.7 Anti-Adhesion Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.8 Negative Pressure Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.9 Static Compression Therapy Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.4 Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.1 Wound Closure Devices Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.2 Advanced Wound Dressings Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.4 Surgical Hemostat Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.5 Tissue Sealant Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.6 Static Compression Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.7 Dynamic Compression Clinical Trials

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
  • 5.3 Drivers and Limiters
    • 5.3.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.3.2 Market Limiters
  • 5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
  • 5.6 Company Profiles
    • 5.6.1 3M
    • 5.6.2 Baxter
    • 5.6.3 Cardinal Health
    • 5.6.4 Essity
    • 5.6.5 Ethicon
    • 5.6.6 Integra Lifesciences
    • 5.6.7 Intuitive Surgical
    • 5.6.8 Medline
    • 5.6.9 Medtronic
    • 5.6.10 MiMedx
    • 5.6.11 Organogenesis
    • 5.6.12 Smith & Nephew
    • 5.6.13 Tactile Medical
  • 5.7 SWOT Analysis
    • 5.7.1 3M
    • 5.7.2 Baxter
    • 5.7.3 Cardinal Health
    • 5.7.4 Essity
    • 5.7.5 Ethicon
    • 5.7.6 Integra Lifesciences
    • 5.7.7 Intuitive Surgical
    • 5.7.8 Medline
    • 5.7.9 Medtronic
    • 5.7.10 MiMedx
    • 5.7.11 Organogenesis
    • 5.7.12 Smith & Nephew
    • 5.7.13 Tactile Medical

Wound Closure Market

  • 6.1 Introduction
    • 6.1.1 Sutures
    • 6.1.2 Staplers
    • 6.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
    • 6.1.4 Skin Closure Strips
    • 6.1.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System
    • 6.1.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure
    • 6.1.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesives
  • 6.2 Market Overview
  • 6.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 6.3.1 Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1 Suture Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.1.1.1 Absorbable Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1.2 Non-Absorbable Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1.3 Knotless Tissue Closure Market
      • 6.3.1.2 Suture Market by Infection Control Type
      • 6.3.1.2.1 Antibacterial Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.2.2 Standard Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.3 Suture Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.1.3.1 Hospital Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.3.2 Alternate Care Suture Market
    • 6.3.2 Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1 Stapler Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.2.1.1 Open Surgery Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1.2 Laparoscopic Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1.3 Skin Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.2 Stapler Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.2.2.1 Hospital Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Stapler Market
    • 6.3.3 Ligation Clip Applier Market
      • 6.3.3.1 Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.3.1.1 Open Surgery Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.1.2 Laparoscopic Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.2 Ligation Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.3.2.1 Hospital Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.2.2 Alternate Care Ligation Market
    • 6.3.4 Skin Closure Strip Market
      • 6.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market
      • 6.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market
    • 6.3.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market
    • 6.3.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market
    • 6.3.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
      • 6.3.7.1 Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
      • 6.3.7.2 Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
  • 6.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Traditional Wound Dressing Market

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Market Overview
  • 7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 7.3.1 Traditional Wound Dressing Market
    • 7.3.2 Gauze Market
      • 7.3.2.1 Hospital Gauze Market
      • 7.3.2.2 Alternate Care Gauze Market
    • 7.3.3 Tape Market
      • 7.3.3.1 Hospital Tape Market
      • 7.3.3.2 Alternate Care Tape Market
    • 7.3.4 Bandage Market
      • 7.3.4.1 Hospital Bandage Market
      • 7.3.4.2 Alternate Care Bandage Market
    • 7.3.5 Cotton Market
      • 7.3.5.1 Hospital Cotton Market
      • 7.3.5.2 Alternate Care Cotton Market
  • 7.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 7.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 7.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Advanced wound dressing Market

  • 8.1 Introduction
    • 8.1.1 Moist Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.2 Antimicrobial Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.3 Interactive Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.4 Non-Adherent Contact Layers
  • 8.2 Market Overview
  • 8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 8.3.1 Advanced Wound Dressing Market
    • 8.3.2 Moist Dressing Market
    • 8.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 8.3.4 Interactive Advanced Dressing Market
    • 8.3.5 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 8.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 8.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 8.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Moist dressing Market

  • 9.1 Introduction
    • 9.1.1 Foam Dressings
    • 9.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
    • 9.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
    • 9.1.4 Alginate Dressings
    • 9.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
    • 9.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
  • 9.2 Market Overview
    • 9.2.1 Moist Dressing Market by Segment
  • 9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 9.3.1 Moist Dressing Market
    • 9.3.2 Foam Dressing Market
    • 9.3.3 Transparent Film Dressing Market
    • 9.3.4 Hydrocolloid Dressing Market
    • 9.3.5 Alginate Dressing Market
    • 9.3.6 Gelling Fiber Dressing Market
    • 9.3.7 Hydrogel Dressing Market
    • 9.3.8 Moist Dressing Market by Care Setting
      • 9.3.8.1 Hospital Moist Dressing Market
      • 9.3.8.2 Alternate Care Moist Dressing Market
  • 9.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 9.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 9.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 9.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Antimicrobial dressing Market

  • 10.1 Introduction
    • 10.1.1 Silver Dressings
    • 10.1.2 Non-Silver Dressings
  • 10.2 Market Overview
    • 10.2.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment
  • 10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 10.3.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 10.3.2 Silver Dressing Market
    • 10.3.3 Non-Silver Dressing Market
    • 10.3.4 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Care Setting
      • 10.3.4.1 Hospital Antimicrobial Dressing Market
      • 10.3.4.2 Alternate Care Antimicrobial Dressing Market
  • 10.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 10.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 10.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Interactive dressing Market

  • 11.1 Introduction
    • 11.1.1 Biomaterials
    • 11.1.2 Skin Substitutes
  • 11.2 Market Overview
  • 11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 11.3.1 Interactive Dressing Market
    • 11.3.2 Collagen Dressing Market
    • 11.3.3 Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.1 Particulate Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.2 Sheet Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.3 Other Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.4 Skin Substitute Market by Care Setting
      • 11.3.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Substitute Market
  • 11.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Non-Adherent Contact layer Market

  • 12.1 Introduction
  • 12.2 Market Overview
  • 12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 12.3.1 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
    • 12.3.2 Hospital Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
    • 12.3.3 Alternate Care Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 12.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 12.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 12.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Surgical Hemostat Market

  • 13.1 Introduction
    • 13.1.1 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.3 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.5 Collagen-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.6 Combination Hemostats
    • 13.1.7 First Responder Hemostats
  • 13.2 Market Overview
  • 13.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 13.3.1 Surgical Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.2 Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.5 Collagen-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.6 Combination Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.7 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.8 First Responder Hemostat Market
  • 13.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 13.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 13.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 13.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Tissue sealant Market

  • 14.1 Introduction
    • 14.1.1 Fibrin Sealants
    • 14.1.2 Protein-Based Sealants
    • 14.1.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
  • 14.2 Market Overview
  • 14.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 14.3.1 Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.2 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.3 Protein-Based Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.4 Synthetic Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 14.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 14.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 14.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Anti-Adhesion Market

  • 15.1 Introduction
  • 15.2 Market Overview
  • 15.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 15.3.1 Anti-Adhesion Market
    • 15.3.2 Gynecological Procedure Market
    • 15.3.3 Abdominal Procedure Market
    • 15.3.4 Other Procedures Market
  • 15.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 15.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 15.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 15.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market

  • 16.1 Introduction
  • 16.2 Market Overview
  • 16.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 16.3.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
    • 16.3.2 Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
      • 16.3.2.1 Hospital Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
      • 16.3.2.2 Alternate Care Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
    • 16.3.3 Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
      • 16.3.3.1 Hospital Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
      • 16.3.3.2 Alternate Care Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
    • 16.3.4 NPWT Dressing Market
      • 16.3.4.1 Hospital NPWT Dressing Market
      • 16.3.4.2 Alternate Care NPWT Dressing Market
    • 16.3.5 NPWT Canister Market
      • 16.3.5.1 Hospital NPWT Canister Market
      • 16.3.5.2 Alternate Care NPWT Canister Market
  • 16.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 16.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 16.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 16.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Static Compression therapy Market

  • 17.1 Introduction
    • 17.1.1 Graduated Compression Stockings
    • 17.1.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
    • 17.1.3 Compression Bandages
    • 17.1.4 Unna Boot
  • 17.2 Market Overview
  • 17.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 17.3.1 Static Compression Therapy Market
    • 17.3.2 Graduated Compression Stocking Market
      • 17.3.2.1 OTC Graduated Compression Stocking Market
      • 17.3.2.2 Medical-Grade Graduated Compression Stocking Market
    • 17.3.3 Anti-Embolism Stocking Market
    • 17.3.4 Compression Bandage Market
      • 17.3.4.1 Compression Kit Market
      • 17.3.4.2 Adhesive Bandage Market
      • 17.3.4.3 Cohesive Bandage Market
    • 17.3.5 Unna Boot Market
  • 17.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 17.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 17.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 17.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Dynamic Compression Therapy Market

  • 18.1 Introduction
    • 18.1.1 Dynamic Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention
    • 18.1.2 Mobile Deep Vein Thrombosis Compression
    • 18.1.3 Pneumatic Compression
  • 18.2 Market Overview
  • 18.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 18.3.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention Device Market
    • 18.3.2 Mobile DVT Prevention Device Market
    • 18.3.3 Pneumatic Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.1 Sequential Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.1.1 Sequential Compression Pump Market
      • 18.3.3.1.2 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
      • 18.3.3.1.3 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market Unit Analysis
      • 18.3.3.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.2.1 Calibrated Sequential Compression Pump Market
      • 18.3.3.2.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
  • 18.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 18.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 18.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 18.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

Product Code: iDATA_USWT24_MS

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 1-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
  • Chart 1-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview, U.S., 2023 & 2030
  • Chart 2-1: Multi-Scenario Wound and Tissue Management Market Forecast, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Chart 5-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 5-2: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 6-1: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 6-2: Leading Competitors, Wound Closure Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 7-1: Traditional Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 7-2: Leading Competitors, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 8-1: Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 8-2: Leading Competitors, Advanced Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 9-1: Moist Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 9-2: Leading Competitors, Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 10-1: Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 10-2: Leading Competitors, Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 11-1: Interactive Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 11-2: Leading Competitors, Interactive Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 12-1: Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 12-2: Leading Competitors, Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 13-1: Surgical Hemostat Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 13-2: Leading Competitors, Surgical Hemostat Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 14-1: Tissue Sealant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 14-2: Leading Competitors, Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 15-1: Anti-Adhesion Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 15-2: Leading Competitors, Anti-Adhesion Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 16-1: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 16-2: Leading Competitors, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 17-1: Static Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 17-2: Leading Competitors, Static Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 18-1: Dynamic Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Chart 18-2: Leading Competitors, Dynamic Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 1-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1-3: Companies Researched in This Report (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1-4: Companies Researched in This Report (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1-5: Factors Impacting the Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1-6: Factors Impacting the Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1-7: Recent Events in the Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2020 - 2024 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1-8: Recent Events in the Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2020 - 2024 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1-9: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (1 of 5)
  • Figure 1-10: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (2 of 5)
  • Figure 1-11: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (3 of 5)
  • Figure 1-12: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (4 of 5)
  • Figure 1-13: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (5 of 5)
  • Figure 1-14: Key Report Updates
  • Figure 1-15: Version History
  • Figure 2-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
  • Figure 2-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
  • Figure 2-3: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
  • Figure 2-4: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
  • Figure 2-5: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
  • Figure 2-6: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)

Figure 4-1 Wound Closure Device Products by Company (1 of 2)

Figure 4-2 Wound Closure Device Market by Company (2 of 2)

Figure 4-3 Traditional Wound Dressing Market by Company (1 of 2)

Figure 4-4 Traditional Wound Dressings by Company (2 of 2)

Figure 4-5 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (1 of 3)

Figure 4-6 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (2 of 3)

Figure 4-7 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (3 of 3)

Figure 4-8 Moist Dressing Market by Company (1 of 2)

Figure 4-9 Moist Dressing Market by Company (2 of 2)

Figure 4-10 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Company

Figure 4-11 Interactive Dressing Market by Company

Figure 4-12 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market by Company

Figure 4-13 Surgical Hemostat Market by Company

Figure 4-14 Tissue Sealant Products by Company

  • Figure 4-15: Anti-Adhesion Market by Company
  • Figure 4-16: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Products by Company
  • Figure 4-17: Static Compression Theraply by Company (1 of 3)
  • Figure 4-18: Static Compression Theraply by Company (2 of 3)
  • Figure 4-19: Static Compression Theraply by Company (3 of 3)
  • Figure 4-20: Dynamic Compression Therapy by Company (1 of 2)
  • Figure 4-21: Dynamic Compression Therapy by Company (2 of 2)
  • Figure 4-22: Class 2 Device Recall Sofsilk Braided Silk sutures
  • Figure 4-23: Class 2 Device Recall ECHELON Endopath Stapler
  • Figure 4-24: Class 2 Device Recall Sofsilk Braided Silk sutures
  • Figure 4-25: Class 2 Device Recall TriStaple 2.0 Black Intelligent Reload
  • Figure 4-26: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
  • Figure 4-27: Class 3 Device Recall Liquiband
  • Figure 4-28: Class 2 Device Recall Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon ECHELON FLEX Powered Plus Stapler
  • Figure 4-29: Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon Dermabond Advanced Topical Skin Adhesive-topical skin adhesive
  • Figure 4-30: Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Device Recall VICRYL MONOFILAMENT VIOLET
  • Figure 4-31: Class 2 Device Recall Velosorb Fast Braided Absorbable Suture
  • Figure 4-32: Class 2 Device Recall Endo GIA Auto Suture Universal Articulating Loading
  • Figure 4-33: Class 2 Device Recall: MERSILK and PERMAHAND, Braided Silk and Virgin Silk Non-Absorbable Suture
  • Figure 4-34: Class 2 Device Recall MERSILK and PERMAHAND, Braided Silk and Virgin Silk NonAbsorbable Suture
  • Figure 4-35: Class 2 Device Recall
  • Figure 4-36: Class 2 Device Recall Coated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture
  • Figure 4-37: Class 2 Device Recall CarboFlex
  • Figure 4-38: Class 2 Device Recall ConvaTec AQUACEL
  • Figure 4-39: Class 2 Device Recall DuoDERM
  • Figure 4-40: Class 2 Device Recall DuoDERM
  • Figure 4-41: Class 2 Device Recall ConvaTec AQUACEL
  • Figure 4-42: Class 2 Device Recall Gentrix Surgical Matrix Thick
  • Figure 4-43: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Ostene
  • Figure 4-44: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Floseal
  • Figure 4-45: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Coseal
  • Figure 4-46: Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon
  • Figure 4-47: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Coseal
  • Figure 4-48: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Preveleak
  • Figure 4-49: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Seprafilm Adhesion Barrier
  • Figure 4-50: Class 2 Device Recall Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Powered Suction Pump
  • Figure 4-51: Class 3 Device Recall UNNA BOOT
  • Figure 4-52: Class 2 Device Recall JOBST Compri2 & JOBST Compri2 Lite
  • Figure 4-53: Vicryl Rapide Versus Nonabsorbable Suture in Repair of Simple Traumatic Extremity and Trunk Lacerations in Adult Patients
  • Figure 4-54: Barbed Suture: A Look at Its Use for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
  • Figure 4-55: Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Control Trial
  • Figure 4-56: Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Conventional Dressings for Prevention of Wound Complications After Revision THA
  • Figure 4-57: PMS Study of Silver I Alginate Non-Woven Dressing (Hydro-Alginate)
  • Figure 4-58: Novel Antimicrobial Dressing in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVCs)
  • Figure 4-59: An Adaptive, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm(R) (PD) as Compared to Mepilex Ag(R) Used as Standard of Care in the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Partial Thickness Burns.
  • Figure 4-60: Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Surgical Removal of Deep-Seated High-Malignant Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk Wall.
  • Figure 4-61: Effect of Negative Wound Pressure on P.S
  • Figure 4-62: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Post-Operative Incision Management

Figure 4-63The Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Healing in Major Amputations

  • Figure 4-64: PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery.
  • Figure 4-65: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Wounds
  • Figure 4-66: A Pilot Study to Compare the Efficacy of NPWT PRO Versus KCI Ulta(R) NPWT and to Compare NPWT PRO Versus NPWT PRO With Simultaneous Irrigation on Wound Healing
  • Figure 4-67: GATT-Patch Versus SURGICEL(R) Original in Minimally Invasive Liver and Gallbladder Surgery
  • Figure 4-68: ACCEL Absorbable Hemostat
  • Figure 4-69: The EVARREST(R) Pediatric Mild or Moderate Liver and Soft Tissue Bleeding Study
  • Figure 4-70: Assessment of Long-term Effects of Tachosil
  • Figure 4-71: Observational Pilot Study With TachoSil as a Ventricular Sealant
  • Figure 4-72: The ROle of Compression StocKings in Heart Failure Patients
  • Figure 4-73: Use of Compression Bandages in the Prevention of Post-mastectomy Lymphoceles
  • Figure 4-74: Adjustable Compression Wrap Versus Compression Bandage Reduce to Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
  • Figure 4-75: Effectiveness of Compression Stocking on Overnight Fluid Shift in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patients
  • Figure 4-76: Evaluation of the Effect of Custom Compression Garments on Standing Static Balance in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome
  • Figure 4-77: Effects of Dynamic Compression Garments in Children With CP
  • Figure 4-78: Design Validation Hemodynamic Study of New Kendall SCD SmartFlow Compression System
  • Figure 4-79: The Use of a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
  • Figure 5-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
  • Figure 5-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
  • Figure 5-3: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 5-4: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 5-5: SWOT Analysis, Baxter
  • Figure 5-6: SWOT Analysis Cardinal Health (1 of 2)
  • Figure 5-7: SWOT Analysis, Essity
  • Figure 5-8: SWOT Analysis, Ethicon
  • Figure 5-9: SWOT Analysis, Integra LifeSciences
  • Figure 5-10: SWOT Analysis, Intuitive Surgical
  • Figure 5-11: SWOT Analysis, Medline
  • Figure 5-12: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic
  • Figure 5-13: SWOT Analysis, MiMedx
  • Figure 5-14: SWOT Analysis, Organogenesis
  • Figure 5-15: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew
  • Figure 5-16: SWOT Analysis, Tactile Medical
  • Figure 6-1: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
  • Figure 6-2: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
  • Figure 6-3: Total Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-4: Suture Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-5: Absorbable Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-6: Non-Absorbable Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-7: Knotless Tissue Closure Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-8: Suture Market by Infection Control Type, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-9: Antibacterial Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-10: Standard Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-11: Suture Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-12: Hospital Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-13: Alternate Care Suture Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-14: Stapler Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-15: Open Surgery Stapler by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-16: Open Surgery Firing Gun Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-17: Open Surgery Cartridge Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-18: Laparoscopic Stapler by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-19: Laparoscopic Firing Gun Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-20: Laparoscopic Cartridge Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-21: Skin Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-22: Stapler Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-23: Hospital Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-24: Alternate Care Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-25: Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-26: Open Surgery Ligation by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-27: Open Surgery Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-28: Open Surgery Single-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-29: Laparoscopic Ligation by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-30: Laparoscopic Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-31: Laparoscopic Single-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-32: Ligation Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-33: Hospital Ligation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-34: Alternate Care Ligation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-35: Skin Closure Strip Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-36: Total Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-37: Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-38: Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-39: Total Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-40: Total Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-41: Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 6-42: Total Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-43: Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-44: Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 6-45: Leading Competitors, Wound Closure Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 7-1: Traditional Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 7-2: Gauze Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 7-3: Total Gauze Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-4: Hospital Gauze Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-5: Alternate Care Gauze Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-6: Tape Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 7-7: Total Tape Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-8: Hospital Tape Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-9: Alternate Care Tape Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-10: Bandage Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 7-11: Total Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-12: Hospital Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-13: Alternate Care Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-14: Cotton Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 7-15: Total Cotton Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-16: Hospital Cotton Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-17: Alternate Care Cotton Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 7-18: Leading Competitors, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 8-1: Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 8-2: Advanced Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 8-3: Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 8-4: Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 8-5: Interactive Advanced Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 8-6: Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 8-7: Leading Competitors, Advanced Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 9-1: Moist Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 9-2: Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-3: Foam Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-4: Transparent Film Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-5: Hydrocolloid Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-6: Alginate Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-7: Gelling Fiber Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-8: Hydrogel Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-9: Moist Dressing Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 9-10: Hospital Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-11: Alternate Care Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 9-12: Leading Competitors, Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 10-1: Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 10-2: Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-3: Total Silver Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-4: Hydrogel Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-5: Total Non-Silver Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-6: Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 10-7: Hospital Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-8: Alternate Care Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 10-9: Leading Competitors, Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 11-1: Interactive Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 11-2: Interactive Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-3: Collagen Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-4: Skin Substitute Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 11-5: Total Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-6: Particulate Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-7: Sheet Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-8: Other Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-9: Hospital Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-10: Alternate Care Skin Substitute Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 11-11: Leading Competitors, Interactive Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 12-1: Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 12-2: Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 12-3: Hospital Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 12-4: Alternate Care Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 12-5: Leading Competitors, Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 13-1: Surgical Hemostat Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 13-2: Surgical Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-3: Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-4: Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-5: Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-6: Collagen-Based Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-7: Combination Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-8: Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-9: First Responder Hemostat Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 13-10: Leading Competitors, Surgical Hemostat Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 14-1: Tissue Sealant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 14-2: Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 14-3: Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 14-4: Protein-Based Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 14-5: Synthetic Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 14-6: Leading Competitors, Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 15-1: Anti-Adhesion Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 15-2: Anti-Adhesion Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 15-3: Gynecological Procedure Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 15-4: Abdominal Procedure Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 15-5: Other Procedures Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 15-6: Leading Competitors, Anti-Adhesion Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 16-1: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 16-2: Single-Use NPWT Pump Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 16-3: Total Single-Use NPWT Pump Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-4: Hospital Single-Use NPWT Pump Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-5: Alternate Care Single-Use NPWT Pump Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-6: Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 16-7: Total Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-8: Hospital Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-9: Alternate Care Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-10: NPWT Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 16-11: Total NPWT Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-12: Hospital NPWT Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-13: Alternate Care NPWT Dressing Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-14: NPWT Canister Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 16-15: Total NPWT Canister Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-16: Hospital NPWT Canister Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-17: Alternate Care NPWT Canister Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 16-18: Leading Competitors, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 17-1: Static Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 17-2: Static Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-3: Graduated Compression Stocking Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 17-4: Total Graduated Compression Stocking Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-5: OTC Graduated Compression Stocking Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-6: Medical-Grade Graduated Compression Stocking Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-7: Anti-Embolism Stocking Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-8: Compression Bandage Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 17-9: Total Compression Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-10: Compression Kit Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-11: Adhesive Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-12: Cohesive Bandage Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-13: Unna Boot Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 17-14: Leading Competitors, Static Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
  • Figure 18-1: Dynamic Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 18-2: Dynamic DVT Prevention Device Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-3: Mobile DVT Prevention Device Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-4: Pneumatic Compression Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
  • Figure 18-5: Sequential Compression Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-6: Sequential Compression Pump Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-7: Sequential Compression Sleeve Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-8: Sequential Compression Sleeve Market Unit Analysis, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-9: Calibrated Sequential Compression Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-10: Calibrated Sequential Compression Pump Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-11: Calibrated Sequential Compression Sleeve Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
  • Figure 18-12: Leading Competitors, Dynamic Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!