Picture
SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Fairfield Market Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1601634

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Fairfield Market Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1601634

U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market - U.S. Sugar Alternatives Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2024-2031 - (By Product Type, By Intensity, By Application, By Distribution Channel, By Geographic Coverage and By Company)

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 161 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 2-5 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
Unprintable PDF & Excel (Single User License)
USD 2599
Unprintable PDF & Excel (Multi User License upto 5 users)
USD 4500
Printable PDF & Excel (Enterprise License above 5 users)
USD 6000

Add to Cart

The U.S. sugar alternatives market is set to expand significantly, growing from $5.2 billion in 2024 to $6.4 billion by 2031, driven by a CAGR of 3.1%. The increasing prevalence of diabetes, growing health awareness, and consumer demand for clean-label, natural, and functional products are key factors propelling this growth.

Market Insights

The U.S. sugar alternatives market is evolving rapidly, influenced by shifts in consumer behavior and advancements in product offerings:

  • 1.Health Consciousness: Rising awareness about the health risks of high sugar consumption is a primary driver, with consumers seeking healthier alternatives.
  • 2.Demand for Clean Labels: Transparent ingredient lists and minimally processed natural products like stevia, agave, and coconut sugar are gaining traction.
  • 3.Diabetic-Friendly Solutions: With over 37 million Americans living with diabetes, sugar alternatives are becoming essential in managing blood sugar levels.
  • 4.Vegan and Plant-Based Trends: The growth of plant-based diets has spurred demand for sugar-free products without refined sugars or animal-derived ingredients.
  • 5.Dominance of HFCS: High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) retains over 50% market share due to its cost-effectiveness and widespread use in processed foods and beverages.

Key Drivers

1. Rising Diabetes Rates

The growing prevalence of diabetes in the U.S. has created a substantial market for sugar substitutes:

  • Consumer Need: Alternatives like stevia, sucralose, allulose, and monk fruit allow diabetics to enjoy sweetened foods without spiking blood glucose levels.
  • Market Expansion: Food manufacturers are reformulating products to cater to this consumer base, driving demand for diabetic-friendly sweeteners.

2. Increased Health Awareness

Growing concerns about obesity and related lifestyle diseases are fueling demand for sugar reduction strategies:

  • Obesity Trends: With over 42.4% of U.S. adults classified as obese, reducing sugar intake has become a priority.
  • Informed Consumers: Millennials and Gen Z are driving demand for natural, low-calorie sweeteners as they increasingly prioritize long-term health outcomes.

Challenges to Market Growth

1. Difficulty Replicating Sugar's Taste and Texture

Replicating the sensory experience of sugar remains a challenge for many sugar alternatives:

  • Taste Limitations: Some sweeteners leave an unpleasant aftertaste, such as bitterness from stevia or artificial notes from sucralose.
  • Functional Limitations: Sugar alternatives often fall short in replicating sugar's role as a preservative, texture modifier, and bulking agent in processed foods.

2. Consumer Skepticism

Despite the benefits, some consumers remain skeptical of artificial sweeteners due to perceived health risks or dissatisfaction with flavor profiles.

Emerging Trends and Opportunities

1. Innovation in Sweetener Formulations

Food and beverage companies are innovating to improve the taste, texture, and functionality of sugar alternatives:

  • Advanced Solutions: Companies like Suntory Holdings have introduced formulas that combine sweeteners with amino acids to enhance sweetness while reducing calories.
  • Improved Stevia: Innovations like Ingredion's Reb M stevia offer better taste profiles compared to earlier stevia generations.

2. Partnerships with Health Brands

Collaborations between sugar alternative companies and health-focused brands are driving market expansion:

  • Functional Products: Partnerships enable the development of products combining sugar substitutes with functional ingredients, appealing to wellness-conscious consumers.
  • Recent Developments: In July 2024, Roquette partnered with Bonumose to develop tagatose, a natural-origin sweetener with clinically proven health benefits.

Regional Insights

The U.S. sugar alternatives market is influenced by region-specific trends and preferences:

1. Growing Demand for Natural Products

The rise of organic and clean-label products is particularly strong in urban and health-conscious regions, where consumers actively seek natural alternatives like monk fruit and coconut sugar.

2. Functional Food Demand

The increasing interest in functional foods, which offer added health benefits beyond basic nutrition, is boosting the adoption of sugar substitutes in both retail and commercial sectors.

Competitive Analysis

The U.S. sugar alternatives market is highly competitive, with both established players and emerging startups driving innovation and growth:

Key Players

  • IFF
  • ADM
  • Cargill, Inc.
  • Ingredion
  • Tate & Lyle
  • Roquette
  • Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
  • Celanese Corporation (Nutrinova)

U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market is Segmented as-

By Product Type

  • HFCS
  • Sugar Alcohols
  • Saccharin
  • Aspartame
  • Sucralose
  • Allulose
  • Stevia
  • (Ace-K, Monk fruit, Neotame)

By Intensity

  • High intensity
  • Low Intensity

By Application

  • Food
  • Beverage
  • Healthcare & Personal care

By Distribution Channel

  • B2B
  • B2C
  • Hypermarkets/Supermarkets
  • Specialty Stores
  • Pharmacies and Drugstores
  • Online retail
  • Others

By Country

  • U.S.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Snapshot
  • 1.2. Future Projections
  • 1.3. Key Market Trends
  • 1.4. Regional Snapshot, by Volume and Value, 2024
  • 1.5. Analyst Recommendations

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Market Definitions and Segmentations
  • 2.2. Market Dynamics
    • 2.2.1. Drivers
    • 2.2.2. Restraints
    • 2.2.3. Market Opportunities
  • 2.3. Value Chain Analysis
  • 2.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 2.5. Pestle Analysis
  • 2.6. Covid-19 Impact Analysis

3. Price Analysis, 2019 - 2023

  • 3.1. Average Price Analysis, by Product Type, US$ Per Ton, 2019 - 2023
  • 3.2. Prominent Factor Affecting Sugar Alternatives Prices

4. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Outlook, 2019 - 2031

  • 4.1. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Outlook, by Product Type, Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (Kilo Tons), 2019 - 2031
    • 4.1.1. Key Highlights
      • 4.1.1.1. HFCS
      • 4.1.1.2. Sugar Alcohols
      • 4.1.1.3. Saccharin
      • 4.1.1.4. Aspartame
      • 4.1.1.5. Sucralose
      • 4.1.1.6. Allulose
      • 4.1.1.7. Stevia
      • 4.1.1.8. Misc. (Ace-K, Monk fruit, Neotame)
  • 4.2. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Outlook, by Intensity, Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (Kilo Tons), 2019 - 2031
    • 4.2.1. Key Highlights
      • 4.2.1.1. High intensity
      • 4.2.1.2. Low Intensity
  • 4.3. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Outlook, by Application, Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (Kilo Tons), 2019 - 2031
    • 4.3.1. Key Highlights
      • 4.3.1.1. Food
      • 4.3.1.2. Beverage
      • 4.3.1.3. Healthcare & Personal care
  • 4.4. U.S. Sugar Alternatives Market Outlook, by Distribution Channel, Value (US$ Mn) and Volume (Kilo Tons), 2019 - 2031
    • 4.4.1. Key Highlights
      • 4.4.1.1. B2B
      • 4.4.1.2. B2C
        • 4.4.1.2.1. Hypermarkets/Supermarkets
        • 4.4.1.2.2. Specialty Stores
        • 4.4.1.2.3. Pharmacies and Drugstores
        • 4.4.1.2.4. Online retail
        • 4.4.1.2.5. Others

5. Competitive Landscape

  • 5.1. Company Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 5.2. Competitive Dashboard
  • 5.3. Company Profiles
    • 5.3.1. IFF
      • 5.3.1.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.1.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.1.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.1.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.2. ADM
      • 5.3.2.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.2.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.2.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.2.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.3. Cargill, Inc
      • 5.3.3.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.3.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.3.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.3.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.4. Ingredion
      • 5.3.4.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.4.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.4.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.4.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.5. Tate & Lyle
      • 5.3.5.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.5.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.5.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.5.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.6. Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
      • 5.3.6.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.6.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.6.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.6.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.7. Merck KGaA
      • 5.3.7.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.7.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.7.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.7.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.8. Pyure Brands LLC
      • 5.3.8.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.8.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.8.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.8.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.9. B&G Foods, Inc.
      • 5.3.9.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.9.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.9.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.9.4. Business Strategies and Development
    • 5.3.10. Cumberland Packing Corp.
      • 5.3.10.1. Company Overview
      • 5.3.10.2. Type Portfolio
      • 5.3.10.3. Financial Overview
      • 5.3.10.4. Business Strategies and Development

6. Appendix

  • 6.1. Research Methodology
  • 6.2. Report Assumptions
  • 6.3. Acronyms And Abbreviations
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!