Picture

Questions?

+1-866-353-3335

SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: DataM Intelligence | PRODUCT CODE: 1594860

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: DataM Intelligence | PRODUCT CODE: 1594860

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market - 2024-2031

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 213 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PDF & Excel (Single User License)
USD 4350
PDF & Excel (Multiple User License)
USD 4850
PDF & Excel (Enterprise License)
USD 7850

Add to Cart

Overview

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market reached US$ 544.24 million in 2023 and is expected to reach US$ 4,927.36 million by 2031, growing with a CAGR of 31.71% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

Remote browser isolation, often known as web isolation, is a security strategy that protects users' devices by isolating them from direct internet access. The isolation is accomplished by conducting all browsing actions within a remote, cloud-based container. By implementing sandboxing for internet browsing, remote browser isolation safeguards data, devices and networks against numerous vulnerabilities posed by rogue website code.

Remote browser isolation solutions are acknowledging the necessity for secure web browsing on mobile devices, resulting in the creation of mobile-centric functionalities. These technologies are designed to ensure uninterrupted and secure web browsing on smartphones and tablets. Mobile-centric Remote Browser Isolation solutions take into account elements like screen dimensions, tactile interactions and resource efficiency to guarantee seamless performance and user-friendly interfaces.

Furthermore, browser extensions and plugins are being developed to include remote browser isolation functionalities directly into widely-used mobile browsers, thereby obviating the necessity for standalone programs. The extensions provide a practical method for consumers to achieve secure browsing on their mobile devices without sacrificing convenience.

Dynamics

The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns

A cybersecurity threat refers to any incident or situation that could lead to detrimental effects on a business's operations, functions, brand, reputation or public image. The rise in cybersecurity threats is fueled by the broadening of attack surfaces and the advancing strategies of malevolent entities. Remote browser isolation, utilizing virtual browser technology, provides an additional security layer to reduce threats originating from online browsers.

For instance, in January 2023, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israel-based software firm, reported a 38% rise in global cyberattacks in recent years by using Remote browser isolation in detection of cyberattacks. Also, in 2022, US experienced a 57% rise in overall cyberattacks, UK a 77% increase and Singapore a 26% increase. Consequently, the escalating cybersecurity concerns are propelling the expansion of the remote browser isolation market.

The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection

The transition from conventional browser isolation techniques to secure browser extensions is motivated by the necessity to reconcile security with productivity in the contemporary business landscape. Although isolation formerly provided strong security, its effect on CPU utilization frequently hindered performance, discouraging adoption by productivity-oriented enterprises. In contemporary workplaces, where browsers and SaaS services are integral to daily functions, the performance drawbacks of conventional isolation methods might be considerably pronounced, impacting security decisions.

Furthermore, the characteristics and prevalence of web-based threats-such as phishing, malware and ransomware-have advanced beyond the efficacy of outdated isolation methods, resulting in new security vulnerabilities. Secure browser extensions mitigate these deficiencies by embedding directly within browsers, offering real-time visibility, risk assessment and automated attack responses via machine learning. This invention provides uninterrupted, proactive protection without hindering productivity, rendering it a vital improvement in browser security solutions.

Performance And Latency Issues

Remote Browser Isolation solutions often entail delegating online browsing tasks to a remote server, potentially resulting in increased page loading times and overall latency. The effect is especially evident for customers dependent on resource-intensive, real-time programs, such as video conferencing tools or cloud-based software, where speed and responsiveness are essential for uninterrupted functionality.

Furthermore, as enterprises increasingly embrace remote work models and cloud-based apps, the demand for high-speed, low-latency browsing experiences escalates. The performance decline linked to Remote Browser Isolation may dissuade firms from implementing these solutions, as they prioritize customer delight and operational efficiency. Thus, the balance between improved security and performance presents a considerable obstacle to the widespread implementation of remote browser isolation, especially in contexts where rapidity and efficiency are critical.

Segment Analysis

The global remote browser isolation market is segmented based on type organization size, end-user and region.

DOM Reconstruction-Based Type Offers Several Advantages For Enhancing Security And Performance

DOM reconstruction-based remote browser isolation has numerous benefits for improving security and performance in the information technology and telecommunications industries. DOM reconstruction mitigates the danger of hazardous material and web-based assaults by eliminating potentially malicious code and known exploits, so offering an additional layer of protection that conventional security measures may fail to identify.

The technology enhances the surfing experience by reducing latency in specific pixel-rendering systems and sending web content directly to the user's local browser, hence improving performance and user satisfaction. Moreover, DOM reconstruction is a more economical approach than certain pixel-pushing techniques, as it obviates the necessity for substantial server-side rendering and diminishes the transfer of online content. It reduces operational expenses related to remote browser isolation while ensuring strong defense against online threats.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Increasing Need For Advanced Cybersecurity Solutions.

The robust regulatory framework in North America, encompassing data protection statutes such as the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) and several industry-specific rules, has expedited the implementation of remote browser isolation to adhere to data security and privacy mandates. US has been a leader in implementing remote browser isolation technology to safeguard against the increasing menace of cyberattacks, including ransomware, malware and phishing.

The substantial number of online transactions and sensitive data transmitted in sectors such as finance, healthcare and telecommunications requires the implementation of stringent web security protocols. The remote browser isolation effectively mitigates web-based risks by isolating them, thereby safeguarding endpoint devices and business networks from potential harm.

Prominent cybersecurity firms and IT service providers in the region are progressively incorporating remote browser isolation into their services, enabling businesses to protect their online browsing activity without sacrificing user experience or system efficiency. The interplay of regulatory compliance, heightened demand for data protection and technical innovation establishes North America as a major market for remote browser isolation solutions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Broadcom, Cisco, Cloudflare, ConnX, Ericom, Forcepoint, McAfee, Proofpoint, Versa Networks and Zscaler.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The war between Russia and Ukraine has profoundly affected remote browser isolation (RBI) solutions, especially in Russia, where heightened digital sovereignty initiatives and international sanctions have compromised Internet infrastructure and online security. The escalation of the conflict has prompted Russia to seek isolation of its Internet ecosystem, resulting in the exit of several international technology firms, including security and cloud service providers.

This has led to a reduced availability of dependable security technologies in Russia, especially sophisticated RBI solutions that depend on international providers for secure web browsing protection. The withdrawal of these foreign services has compelled Russian entities to rely on less dependable domestic alternatives that may not provide equivalent security against cyber threats, especially those aimed at browsers.

The sanctions and domestic censorship in Russia have exacerbated the nation's cybersecurity environment. The increasing fragmentation of the global Internet environment, coupled with the diminished presence of international network operators and service providers, has impeded the efficacy of RBI solutions. These technologies depend significantly on uninterrupted connectivity and worldwide infrastructure to detect threats in real-time.

Type

  • DOM Reconstruction-Based
  • Pixel Pushing-Based
  • Network Vector Rendering
  • Others

Organization Size

  • Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Large Enterprises

End-User

  • Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
  • IT and Telecom
  • Healthcare
  • Government and Defense
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Education
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global remote browser isolation market segmentation based on type organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the remote browser isolation market level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global remote browser isolation market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 213 pages

Target Audience 2024

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies
Product Code: ICT8769

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.3. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns
      • 4.1.1.2. The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Performance And Latency Issues
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5. Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
  • 5.6. DMI Opinion

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID-19
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. DOM Reconstruction-Based*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Pixel Pushing-Based
  • 7.4. Network Vector Rendering
  • 7.5. Others

8. By Organization Size

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 8.2. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Large Enterprises

9. By End-User

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 9.2. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. IT and Telecom
  • 9.4. Healthcare
  • 9.5. Government and Defense
  • 9.6. Retail and E-Commerce
  • 9.7. Education
  • 9.8. Others

10. By Region

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2. North America
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.6.1. US
      • 10.2.6.2. Canada
      • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
  • 10.3. Europe
    • 10.3.1. Introduction
    • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.6.1. Germany
      • 10.3.6.2. UK
      • 10.3.6.3. France
      • 10.3.6.4. Italy
      • 10.3.6.5. Spain
      • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
  • 10.4. South America
    • 10.4.1. Introduction
    • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
      • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
      • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
  • 10.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1. Introduction
    • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.6.1. China
      • 10.5.6.2. India
      • 10.5.6.3. Japan
      • 10.5.6.4. Australia
      • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1. Introduction
    • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. Broadcom*
    • 12.1.1. Company Overview
    • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4. Key Developments
  • 12.2. Cisco
  • 12.3. Cloudflare
  • 12.4. ConnX
  • 12.5. Ericom
  • 12.6. Forcepoint
  • 12.7. McAfee
  • 12.8. Proofpoint
  • 12.9. Versa Networks
  • 12.10. Zscaler

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

  • 13.1. About Us and Services
  • 13.2. Contact Us
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!