Why do many KOLs prefer Teva's Ajovy or Lilly's Emgality over Amgen/Novartis' Aimovig for the preventive management of migraine? Over the next five years, neurologists anticipate subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs will challenge Botox as the first-line treatment for migraine prevention, but that use of Lundbeck's Vyepti will remain limited - why? KOLs critically assess the prospects of launched and pipeline therapies.
Key questions answered:
- How do KOLs assess the potential impact of Xeomin, Dysport and prabotulinumtoxinA on the use of AbbVie's well-established Botox?
- Why are experts impressed by AbbVie's Botox+ Qulipta/Aquipta combination trial?
- How do KOLs prescribe Pfizer's Nurtec ODT/Vydura, and what other studies do experts recommend?
- What underpins neurologists' opinion that AbbVie's Qulipta/Aquipta is preferable to Pfizer's Nurtec ODT in the preventive management of migraine?
- Why do neurologists say that despite being an effective treatment, Lilly's lasmiditan is currently reserved for later-line therapy?
- Why are KOLs not particularly impressed by the clinical data for Pfizer's Zavzpret?
Key brands covered in this report:
- Botox
- Aimovig
- Ajovy
- Emgality
- Reyvow/Rayvow
|
- Ubrelvy
- Nurtec ODT/Vydura
- Qulipta/Aquipta
- Vyepti
- Zavzpret
|