PUBLISHER: DelveInsight | PRODUCT CODE: 1340017
PUBLISHER: DelveInsight | PRODUCT CODE: 1340017
DelveInsight's "Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) - Market Insights, Epidemiology and Market Forecast - 2032" report delivers an in-depth understanding of necrotizing enterocolitis, historical and forecasted epidemiology as well as necrotizing enterocolitis market trends in the United States, EU4 (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) and the United Kingdom, and Japan.
The necrotizing enterocolitis market report provides current treatment and prevention practices, emerging drugs, market share of individual therapies, and current and forecasted 7MM necrotizing enterocolitis market size from 2019 to 2032. The report also covers current necrotizing enterocolitis treatment practices/algorithms, prophylactic treatment, and unmet medical needs to curate the best opportunities and assess the market's potential.
Study Period: 2019-2032.
Necrotizing enterocolitis is a common and devastating gastrointestinal emergency that primarily affects premature infants worldwide in neonatal intensive care units. At birth, neonates are rapidly exposed to environmental bacteria through maternal vaginal flora and enteral feedings. Preterm neonates experience delayed and often inappropriate colonization, leading to increased inflammatory responses and abnormal bacterial glycosylation patterns.
After a premature baby is born, steps are taken to prevent the infant from getting infections. If these preventive measures are unsuccessful, the baby can experience symptoms like a swollen abdomen, tiredness, and breathing pauses. Doctors conduct tests such as a complete blood count, a C-reactive protein test, and x-rays to diagnose the condition. After these tests, it is confirmed that the baby has necrotizing enterocolitis.
No approved pharmaceutical treatments are specifically for necrotizing enterocolitis. Due to the lack of effective treatments for necrotizing enterocolitis, the high mortality rate research focus has shifted to testing strategies for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis, specifically early exposure to colostrum and mother's milk, careful nutritional consideration, probiotics, environmental protection, skin-to-skin care (SSC), and pharmacology. Dietary supplements containing live bacteria (probiotics) are suggested to be effective in preventing NEC, but they are not subject to FDA premarket review and approval requirements for safety and effectiveness or to the manufacturing and testing standards for products regulated as drugs by FDA. A premature infant in the US NICU died in 2014 of gastrointestinal mucormycosis caused by mold from a contaminated probiotic dietary supplement.
As the market is derived using a patient-based model, the necrotizing enterocolitis epidemiology chapter in the report provides historical as well as forecasted epidemiology segmented by total incident cases of preterm infants by birth weight (=1,500 g) and total incident cases of necrotizing enterocolitis in the 7MM covering the United States, EU4 (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) and the United Kingdom, and Japan from 2019 to 2032.
The drug chapter segment of the necrotizing enterocolitis report encloses a detailed analysis of the late-stage (Phase III) pipeline drug. There are currently no approved therapies for necrotizing enterocolitis. It also helps understand the clinical trial details, expressive pharmacological action, agreements and collaborations, advantages and disadvantages of each included drug and the latest news and press releases.
IBT is currently developing the drug candidate IBP-9414. The ambition for IBP-9414 is to become the world's first approved probiotic drug to prevent life-threatening diseases in premature infants, including necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis, by promoting healthy stomach-and bowel development in premature infants. IBP-9414 contains the active compound Lactobacillus reuteri, a human bacterial strain naturally present in breast milk. Lactobacillus reuteri is a live bacterium known to be anti-inflammatory, anti-pathogenic, and beneficial to gut motility and mucosa maturity. IBP-9414 is currently in an ongoing registration-enabling pivotal Phase III study to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis.
Note: Detailed emerging therapies assessment will be provided in the final report.
Necrotizing enterocolitis is the primary surgical emergency in newborns and the leading cause of gastrointestinal mortality among this vulnerable group. Due to its high mortality rate, challenging treatment, substantial financial impact on society, and long-term complications for survivors, there is an urgent requirement to develop innovative preventive strategies to eliminate necrotizing enterocolitis.
One potential preventative strategy for necrotizing enterocolitis is the use of probiotics. Although there has been significant interest in probiotics in neonatal care for decades, no clear guidelines exist regarding which probiotic to use or for which patients, and no FDA-approved products exist for necrotizing enterocolitis. In addition, there is a lack of agreement regarding the benefits of probiotics in neonates and some concerns about the safety and efficacy of available products.
Several recent meta-analyses have evaluated the effects of probiotics to prevent NEC (Bell Stage 2 or 3), late-onset sepsis, and death in preterm infants (typically very low birth weight infants). In the past 5 years, there have been numerous published systematic reviews. Despite significant heterogeneity among studies, the cumulative pooled risk ratio (RR) for NEC (including more than 10,000 infants) strongly favors treatment with probiotics to prevent NEC.
This section focuses on the uptake rate of potential drugs expected to be launched in the market during 2019-2032. No other company is developing an advanced preventive treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis in the late stage except for Infant Bacterial Therapeutics. We estimate that the market uptake of IBP-9414 will be fairly quick, as it would be the first probiotic product with pharmaceutical quality to be approved for this condition.
The report provides insights into therapeutic candidates in the different stages. It also analyzes key players involved in developing targeted therapeutics.
To keep up with current market trends, we take KOLs and SMEs' opinions working in the domain through primary research to fill the data gaps and validate our secondary research. Industry Experts contacted for insights on the necrotizing enterocolitis evolving preventive treatment landscape, patient reliance on conventional therapies, patient therapy switching acceptability, drug uptake, along with challenges related to accessibility, including pulmonologists, HCPs, physicians, and others.
DelveInsight's analysts connected with 10+ KOLs to gather insights; however, interviews were conducted with 5+ KOLs in the 7MM. Centers such as Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, the United States, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, the United Kingdom, Department of Pediatrics, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, etc., were contacted. Their opinion helps understand and validate current and emerging therapy treatment patterns or necrotizing enterocolitis market trends. This will support the clients in potential upcoming novel prophylactic treatments by identifying the overall scenario of the market and the unmet needs.
We perform qualitative and market intelligence analysis using various approaches, such as SWOT analysis and Analyst views. In the SWOT analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in terms of disease diagnosis, patient awareness, patient burden, competitive landscape, cost-effectiveness, and geographical accessibility of therapies are provided. These pointers are based on the analyst's discretion and assessment of the patient burden, cost analysis, and existing and evolving treatment landscape.
Reimbursement of rare disease therapies can be limited due to lack of supporting policies and funding, challenges of high prices, lack of specific approaches to evaluating rare disease drugs given limited evidence, and payers' concerns about budget impact. The high cost of rare disease drugs usually has a limited effect on the budget due to the small number of eligible patients being prescribed the drug. The US FDA has approved several rare disease therapies recently. From a patient perspective, health insurance and payer coverage guidelines surrounding rare disease treatments restrict broad access to these treatments, leaving only a small number of patients who can bypass insurance and pay for products independently.
The report further provides detailed insights on the country-wise accessibility and reimbursement scenarios, cost-effectiveness scenario of currently used therapies, programs making accessibility easier and out-of-pocket costs more affordable, insights on patients insured under federal or state government prescription drug programs, etc.